Huawei, Qualcomm Completed LTE CSFB (Circuit Switched Fallback) to UMTS Testing

3GPP LTE Circuit Switched Fallback (CSFB)

Huawei and Qualcomm have completed an LTE FDD flash CSFB (Circuit Switched Fallback) voice call to UMTS using R9 protocol and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon S4 processor, the MSM8960, during a series of optimisation tests.

The tests, based on the flash CSFB voice service for the R9 protocol, resulted in low call setup latency than that of the R8 protocol, and close to that of a native UMTS voice call. During the CSFB testing, which also included LTE TDD calls, good call setup times were seen for both UMTS and GSM.

The introduction of R9 CSFB will further enhance users’ experiences and enable voice services on their LTE-based smartphones, through CSFB to GSM and UMTS. The joint CSFB testing was part of an ongoing cooperation between Huawei and Qualcomm on interoperability testing and optimisation involving GSM/UMTS/LTE TDD/FDD technologies.

Huawei’s LTE CSFB service has been commercially deployed in the Middle East, Asia Pacific, Europe and other regions, allowing users to access LTE data and voice services.

iPhone In Your Hand Is Not Good Enough

I know some people already termed me as an Android fanboy just reading the title of this article.But this is nothing to with Android or iOS. Now as I already removed all your doubts about the software part now let’s talked about the real stuff.

We as Telecom/Wireless engineers are working on most of the latest technology and that reflects that we are one of the few engineering sector where technology changes very fast. Today’s latest gadgets are tomorrow’s crap piece of old stuffs. We follow 3GPP specifications and most of the time the latest one for our newer projects. But have you ever thought the smartphone/mobile in your hand has something to do with you?

How many of you who knows that the network in your area supports HSPA+ with 42 Mbps or higher and still buy a smartphone with a quite old modem just because the software looks fancy.

iphone_4s_teardown-chipset

I took iPhone case because they are the one who delivers these old modems in their smartphone most of the time without thinking for an upgrade.

So let’s discuss about modems. In today’s market the most latest modem solutions are the one with LTE chipsets or with HSPA+ (42 Mbps) chipsets.

But the iPhone 4S has a Qualcomm 14.4Mbps HSPA (Category 10 UE) chipset. So basically one of the UE (modem) on which you might have worked on some 3-4 years back. That is quite old enough to say iPhone 4S is a modern day gadget where mobile technology dies in 2 to 3 years.

There are some who argues but the software looks so smooth and who needs more throughput.

Seriously if you think you do not need any more throughput then thanks your job is done. No need to write any new code, we do not need any new specifications and let’s stop all the testing.

Throughput is the only thing and I think in modern Telecom era this is the backbone of many new wireless technology.

If you are working in a mobile company and using your own products it’s a completely different scenario.

As a telecom engineer you should use the latest to feel the latest. You are the one who is building these ultra modern communication systems. If you will be far behind in the past who will then write the future?

LTE Vs HSPA+: Where is the future?

The history of mobile communication is long and an interesting one. Started back in 1950s the wireless technology evolved with time and requirements. The biggest technology breakthrough came as GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications, originally Groupe Spécial Mobile). GSM was basically developed for voice based communication and it was a near-perfect system for that purpose. But when data communication requirements came into picture GPRS (Global Packet Radio System) was introduced for better data throughput. They say Data Throughput is never enough.

3G-HSPA-LTE-Evolution

This simple concept of better data speed created 3G, which was quite good. Later from 3GPP release 5 HSDPA was introduced and in 3GPP release 6 HSUPA.

HSPA+

Then came HSPA+ which is basically enhancement to HSDPA and HSUPA. Most of the current network infrastructure supports downlink HSPA+ speed of 21 Mbps or 42 Mbps. The seed is good enough for current data hungry smart phones. But as I said earlier there is no upper limit to data rate.

HSPA-Advanced-Data-Throughput

HSPA+ enhances the mobile broadband experience by providing up to 28 Mbps peak data rates in the downlink (DL) in R7, and up to 42 Mbps in R8. HSPA+ has a strong evolution path and will continue to evolve beyond HSPA+ R8 to further enhance the HSPA+ performance and provide a clear evolution path for current HSPA networks. HSPA+ R9 and beyond is considering enhancements such as expanding HSPA+ multicarrier beyond 10 MHz deployments combined with MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) to provide peak rates of 84 Mbps and more.

LTE

The next generation technology which was designed to take data communication to next level is LTE (Long Term Evolution). As LTE’s main requirement was to make a better technology for data communication LTE was made IP based, means instead of CS and PS plane (IUps and IUcs) now everything will be on one plane and that is only PS.

So how much data throughput one can expect from LTE?

Theoretical speeds boast downlink speeds of 300 Mbps and uploads of 75Mbps.

But that not enough!

Yes this is not the end as LTE is designed to evolve means it is easy to make changes and adopt to bring the best. As a result of that LTE-Advanced came into picture.

LTE-Advanced

LTE-Advanced can be considered as the real 4G technology (ITU). The throughput requirement for LTE-Advanced is set to 1 Gbps.

To accommodate LTE-Advanced capabilities, three new UE categories 6-8 have been defined. UE categories 1-5 for Release 8 and Release 9 were defined for LTE.

LTE-LTE-Advaned-Data-Rate-THroughput

Here is a road map for AT&T and it shows where AT&T is heading from network deployment prospective.

Here is the technology evolution path for HSPA+ and LTE. The LTE-Advanced 2016 (1 Gbps downlink) looks very interesting.

Conclusion

Although HSPA+ is the technology of today, LTE-Advanced will open many new doors for next generation smartphones and mobile equipments. The future is definitely with LTE and there is no doubt about that.

Do you think otherwise? Give your view.

Further Studies on LTE and HSPA+

There are numerous resources to improve your grip in LTE and HSPA+. For example 4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband is a amazing book for LTE as well as LTE-Advanced research.

To get some strong understanding on HSPA+ try WCDMA for UMTS: HSPA Evolution and LTE authored by Harri Holma.

LTE Network Deployment Worldwide Status

LTE came into picture sometime back but still the worldwide deployment did not catch up as expected. Starting from the first quarter of 2012 many network operators already showed their interest to deploy LTE in near future.

According to the latest GSA report:

  • 338 operators are investing in LTE in 101 countries
  • 280 operator commitments in 90 countries
  • 58 pre-commitment trials in 11 more countries
  • 89 commercial networks in 45 countries
  • GSA forecasts 150 commercial LTE networks in 64 countries by end 2012

The 3GPP LTE system, which comprises FDD and TDD modes, delivers capacity and data throughput enhancements and low latency to support new services and features requiring higher levels of capability and performance. The primary drive towards LTE from operators is the need for more capacity, performance management and improved efficiencies to lower the unit cost of delivering traffic. LTE is the next step in the user experience, enhancing more demanding applications such as interactive TV, mobile video blogging, advanced gaming, and professional services. LTE supports a full IP-based network and harmonization with other radio access technologies and is the natural evolution choice for GSM/HSPA, CDMA and WiMAXTM network operators, thereby enabling a single unifying global standard for even higher scale economies and simplifying roaming. LTE is a global phenomenon.

Design targets for first LTE deployments include:

  • Instantaneous downlink peak data rate of at least 100 Mb/s within 20 MHz allocation (5 bps/Hz)
  • Instantaneous uplink peak data rate of 50 Mb/s (2.5 bps/Hz within a 20MHz uplink allocation)
  • Downlink: average user throughput per MHz, 3 to 4 times Release 6 HSDPA
  • Uplink: average user throughput per MHz, 2-3 times Release 6 Enhanced Uplink
  • E-UTRAN optimized for low mobile speed: 0-15 km/h. Higher mobile speed between 15-120 km/h should be supported with high performance. Mobility across the cellular network shall be maintained at speeds 120 km/h-350 km/h (or even up to 500 km/h depending on the frequency band)
  • Spectrum flexibility: scalable to operate in 1.4, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 MHz allocations: uplink and downlink…paired and unpaired
  • Co-existence with GERAN/3G on adjacent channels; with other operators on adjacent channels; overlapping or adjacent spectrum at country borders; handover with UTRAN & GERAN

Global Deployment of LTE Networks

Country OperatorLaunch Date
Norway
TeliaSonera
14.12.09
Sweden
TeliaSonera
14.12.09
Uzbekistan
MTS
28.07.10
Uzbekistan
UCell
09.08.10
Poland
Aero2 (LTE FDD and TDD)
07.09.10
USA
MetroPCS
21.09.10
Austria
A1 Telekom
05.11.10
Sweden
TeleNor Sweden
15.11.10
Sweden
Tele2 Sweden
15.11.10
Hong Kong
CSL Limited
25.11.10
Finland
Elisa

30.11.10
Denmark
TeliaSonera
09.12.10
Estonia
EMT
17.12.10
Japan
NTT DoCoMo
24.12.10
Germany
Deutsche Telekom
05.04.11
Philippines
Smart Communications
16.04.11
Lithuania
Omnitel
28.04.11
Latvia
LMT
31.05.11
South Korea
SK Telecom
01.07.11
South Korea
LG U+
01.07.11
Germany
O2
01.07.11
Canada
Rogers Wireless
07.07.11
Austria
T-Mobile
28.07.11
USA
Mosaic Telecom
July 2011
Canada
Bell Mobility
14.09.11
Saudi Arabia
Mobily (LTE TDD)
14.09.11
Saudi Arabia
Zain
14.09.11
USA
AT&T Mobility
18.09.11
UAE
Etisalat
25.09.11
Australia Telstra27.09.11
Denmark
TDC
10.10.11
Austria
3
18.11.11
Puerto Rico
AT&T Mobility
20.11.11
Puerto Rico
Claro
24.11.11
Kyrgyzstan
Saima Telecom
09.12.11
Brazil
Sky Brazil (LTE TDD)
13.12.11
Finland
DNA
13.12.11
Uruguay
Antel
13.12.11
USA
Cricket
21.12.11
Singapore
SingTel
22.12.11
Kuwait
Viva
27.12.11
Armenia
Vivacell-MTS
28.12.11
Bahrain
Viva Bahrain
01.01.12
Hungary
T Mobile
01.01.12
South Korea
KT
03.01.12
Russia
Yota
15.01.12
Canada
TELUS
10.02.12
USA
Peoples Telephone Co-op
14.02.12
Japan
Softbank Mobile XGP/LTE TDD
24.02.12
Portugal
TMN (Portugal Telecom)
12.03.12
Portugal
Vodafone Portugal
12.03.12
Japan
eMobile
15.03.12
USA
US Cellular
2.03.12
Croatia
T Mobile/T-Hrvatski Telekom
23.03.12
Croatia
VIPNet
23.03.12
USA
Panhandle (PTCI)
March 2012
Belarus
Yota Bel
01.04.12
Australia
NBN Co (LTE TDD)
02.04.12
India
Bharti Airtel (LTE TDD)
10.04.12
Angola
Movicel
14.04.12
Puerto Rico
Open Mobile
19.04.12
Moldova
IDC
21.04.12
Sweden
3 (LTE FDD and TDD)
23.04.12
Hong Kong
China Mobile HK
25.04.12
Hong Kong
PCCW
25.04.12
USA
Cellcom
30.04.12
USA
Pioneer Cellular
30.04.12
Netherlands
Vodafone
01.05.12
Hong Kong
Hutchison 3 HK
02.05.12
Netherlands
Ziggo
03.05.12
Netherlands
Tele2
08.05.12
NetherlandsKPN
11.05.12
NetherlandsT-Mobile
11.05.12
Namibia
MTC
16.05.12
USA
BendBroadband
17.05.12
Tanzania
Smile
30.05.12
UAE
Du
12.06.12
Colombia
Une-UPM
14.06.12
Azerbaijan
Azercell
19.06.12
Czech Rep
Telefonica O2
19.06.12
Mauritius
Orange
21.06.12
UK
UK Broadband (LTE TDD)
28.06.12
Dominican R.
Orange Dominicana
09.07.12

Non-Voice Emergency Services in 3GPP

While going through latest changes in 3GPP I found out that this new feature “Non-Voice Emergency Services”. It is potentially a big and important feature in next generation mobile networks which are mostly IP driven.

So what is Non-Voice Emergency Services?

Traditionally all the emergency services were over voice (CS) interface, but instead it is better to have a alternative to communicate with emergency services over new IP and other traditional communication channels like SMS. This will help many subscribers to use this new type of emergency communication media when emergency arises.

These are some of the alternatives which can be used instead of traditional voice based emergency calls.

  1. Session based text messages (which does not include SMS) from citizen to emergency services
  2. Session based and session-less instant messaging type sessions with emergency services
  3. Multi-media (e.g., pictures, video clips) transfer to emergency services either during or after other communications with emergency services.
  4. Real-time video session with emergency services

In addition to support the general public, this capability would facilitate emergency communications to emergency services by individuals with special needs (e.g., hearing impaired citizens).

To avail these new features two different types of emergency services are now available in 3GPP, Next Generation Emergency Service and Non-Voice Emergency Service.

Next Generation Emergency Service:

Next Generation Emergency Service focuses on Next Generation Network (NGN) technology and does not include legacy messaging services, such as Short Messaging Service (SMS).

References

LTE Advanced: Heterogeneous Networks

Long-Term Evolution (LTE) allows operators to use new and wider spectrum and complements 3G networks with higher data rates, lower latency and a flat, IP-based architecture. To further improve the broadband user experience in a ubiquitous and cost-effective manner, 3GPP has been working on various aspects of the LTE Advanced standard.

LTE Heterogeneous Network

Since radio link performance is fast approaching theoretical limits with 3G Enhancements and LTE, the next performance leap in wireless networks will come from an evolved network topology. The concept of LTE Advanced-based Heterogeneous Networks is about improving spectral efficiency per unit area. Using a mix of macro, pico, femto and relay base stations, heterogeneous networks enable flexible and low-cost deployments and provide a uniform broadband experience to users anywhere in the network.

Range expansion allows more user terminals to benefit directly from low-power base stations such as picos, femtos and relays. Adaptive inter-cell interference coordination provides smart resource allocation amongst interfering cells and improves inter-cell “fairness” in a heterogeneous network.

To achieve performance improvements in LTE Advanced, the 3GPP has been working on various aspects of LTE including higher order MIMO (multiple antennas), carrier aggregation (multiple component carriers), and heterogeneous networks (picos,femtos and relays).

Since improvements in spectral efficiency per link are approaching theoretical limits with 3G and LTE, the next generation of technology is about improving spectral efficiency per unit area.

Current wireless cellular networks

Current wireless cellular networks are typically deployed as homogeneous networks using a macro-centric planning process. A homogeneous cellular system is a network of base stations in a planned layout and a collection of user terminals, in which all the base stations have similar transmit power levels, antenna patterns, receiver noise floors and similar backhaul connectivity to the (packet) data network. Moreover, all base stations offer unrestricted assess to user terminals in the network, and serve roughly the same number of user terminals, all of which carry similar data flows with similar QoS requirements.

The locations of the macro base stations are carefully chosen through network planning, and the base station settings are properly configured to maximize the coverage and control the interference between base stations. As the traffic demand grows and the RF environment changes, the network relies on cell splitting or additional carriers to overcome capacity and link budget limitations and maintain uniform user experience. However, this deployment process is complex and iterative. Moreover, site acquisition for macro base stations with towers becomes more difficult in dense urban areas. A more flexible deployment model is needed for operators to improve broadband user experience in a ubiquitous and cost-effective way.

Heterogeneous Network

Wireless cellular systems have evolved to the point where an isolated system (with just one base station) achieves near optimal performance, as determined by information theoretic capacity limits. Future gains of wireless networks will be obtained more from advanced network topology, which will bring the network closer to the mobile users. Heterogeneous networks, utilizing a diverse set of base stations, can be deployed to improve spectral efficiency per unit area.

This cellular system consists of regular (planned) placement of macro base stations that typically transmit at high power level (~5W – 40W), overlaid with several pico base stations, femto base stations and relay base stations, which transmit at substantially lower power levels (~100mW – 2W) and are typically deployed in a relatively unplanned manner.

The low-power base stations can be deployed to eliminate coverage holes in the macro-only system and improve capacity in hot spots. While the placement of macro base stations in a cellular network is generally based on careful network planning, the placement of pico/relay base stations may be more or less ad hoc, based on just a rough knowledge of coverage issues and traffic density (e.g. hot spots) in the network. Due to their lower transmit power and smaller physical size, pico/femto/relay base stations can offer flexible site acquisitions. Relay base stations offer additional flexibility in backhaul where wireline backhaul is unavailable or not economical.

In a homogeneous network, each mobile terminal is served by the base stations with the strongest signal strength, while the unwanted signals received from other base stations are usually treated as interference. In a heterogeneous network, such principles can lead to significantly suboptimal performance. In such systems, smarter resource coordination among base stations, better server selection strategies and more advanced techniques for efficient interference management can provide substantial gains in throughput and user experience as compared to a conventional approach of deploying cellular network infrastructure.

Are heterogeneous networks the future of wireless network?

3GPP Machine-Type Communication (MTC)

Machine-type communication (MTC) is a form of data communication which involves one or more entities that do not necessarily need human interaction.

For MTC communication the following communication scenarios can be identified:

MTC Devices communicating with one or more MTC Server

Communication scenario with MTC devices communicating with MTC server. MTC server is located in the operator domain.

MTC Devices communicating with one or more MTC Server

Communication scenario with MTC devices communicating with MTC server. MTC server is located outside the operator domain.

The network operator provides network connectivity to MTC Server(s). This applies to MTC Servers controlled by the network operator or to MTC Servers not controlled by the network operator.

Communication scenario with MTC devices communicating with MTC server. MTC server is located outside the operator domain.

MTC devices communicating with each other

The communication scenario where the MTC Devices communicate directly without intermediate MTC Server.

MTC devices communicating with each other

As technology evolves, there are important changes in capabilities and costs. More computing power, memory and communication capabilities make it possible for machines to take over tasks presently done by, but not well suited to human beings. Lower costs make it practical for machines to take over tasks not well suited to expensive human beings. Increasing capabilities and lower costs together open new opportunities for revenue generating services not previously economical to do.

The increasing capability of machines makes it possible to avoid dull and repetitious work having to be done by people, freeing them to utilize their capabilities and intelligence in better suited and much more fruitful activities.

Definitions

MTC Device: A MTC Device is a UE equipped for Machine Type Communication, which communicates through a PLMN with MTC Server(s) and/or other MTC Device(s).

NOTE: A MTC Device might also communicate locally (wirelessly, possibly through a PAN, or hardwired) with other entities which provide the MTC Device “raw data” for processing and communication to the MTC Server(s) and/or other MTC Device(s). Local communication between MTC Device(s) and other entities is out of scope of this technical specification.

MTC Feature: MTC Features are network functions to optimise the network for use by M2M applications.

MTC Group: A MTC Group is a group of MTC Devices that share one or more MTC Features and that belong to the same MTC Subscriber.

MTC Server: A MTC Server is a server, which communicates to the PLMN itself, and to MTC Devices through the PLMN. The MTC Server can also have an interface which can be accessed by the MTC User. The MTC Server can:

  • Provides services for other servers (e.g. The MTC Server is a Services Capability Server for an Application Server), and/or
  • Provides services for applications and can host the application (e.g. The MTC Server is an Application Server).

MTC User: A MTC User uses the service provided by the MTC Server.

MTC Subscriber: A MTC Subscriber is a legal entity having a contractual relationship with the network operator to provide service to one or more MTC Devices.

Examples of MTC applications

Service AreaMTC applications
SecuritySurveillance systems
Backup for landline
Control of physical access (e.g. to buildings)
Car/driver security
Tracking & TracingFleet Management
Order Management
Pay as you drive
Asset Tracking
Navigation
Traffic information
Road tolling
Road traffic optimisation/steering
PaymentPoint of sales
Vending machines
Gaming machines
HealthMonitoring vital signs
Supporting the aged or handicapped
Web Access Telemedicine points
Remote diagnostics
Remote Maintenance/ControlSensors
Lighting
Pumps
Valves
Elevator control
Vending machine control
Vehicle diagnostics
MeteringPower
Gas
Water
Heating
Grid control
Industrial metering
Consumer DevicesDigital photo frame
Digital camera
eBook

References